By Adamu Hamza Marree Talum
As I stated in my first article, my growing interest in defending Alhaji Dauda Kahutu Rarara against the unjustified criticism surrounding the revocation of his honorary doctorate continues to deepen. This is the second installment in the five-part series I promised, and it aims to explore Rarara’s contributions to literature—particularly his mastery of poetry.
This reminds me of a witty epigram: “Not every fool is a poet, but every poet is a fool.” Though simple, this statement draws a line between true knowledge and ignorance. Indeed, to be a poet requires a unique ability to transform natural expression into an art form that matches the ambiance and atmosphere of poetry. Try asking an unskilled person to compose a poem—you’ll quickly see the difference between talent and pretense.
Let me reiterate once more: I am not connected to Rarara, nor am I writing this for any form of payment. I am simply stating facts that may not sit well with some, but remain true nonetheless.
Rarara’s strength lies in his poetic expression—his deliberate word choice, his style, and his ability to weave language with emotion and purpose. These qualities should have earned him much more than an honorary degree. His masterful use of grammar and literary devices in his lyrical compositions remains unmatched among contemporary Hausa singers.
The only major criticism against him is his unwavering support for President Bola Ahmed Tinubu, a figure many Nigerians blame for the country’s current economic hardships. But let’s separate art from politics. Talent should not be buried under political bias.
I maintain my position: even some of the most academically accomplished Hausa scholars today cannot produce the kind of rich, lyrical poetry that Rarara creates effortlessly.
We often say "knowledge is power"—but without talent, knowledge alone cannot illuminate. Talent is the spark that makes knowledge impactful.
Thankfully, the European American University is reconsidering its decision regarding Rarara’s honorary doctorate after recognizing that he was unfairly judged. As I mentioned in my first article, I do not share Rarara’s political views, but as a young writer, I will not let my differences blind me to the truth.
Many of Rarara’s critics speak not from a place of justice, but from envy. Sadly, in our society, some people seem to find comfort in seeing others fail.
Let me assure you again: Rarara is more than qualified for an honorary doctorate degree. In fact, he deserves a national award.
To be continued…
Post a Comment